ElfasVonPa rašė:tai nereiskia kad mokslininkai kalbantys filme yra ne mokslininkai.
Štai ką filme kalbantis mokslininkas sako apie filmą:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/What_the_B ... c_reaction
David Albert, a physicist who appears in the film, has accused the filmmakers of
selectively editing his interview to make it appear that he endorses the film's thesis that quantum mechanics is linked with consciousness. He says he is
"profoundly unsympathetic to attempts at linking quantum mechanics with consciousness."
http://skeptico.blogs.com/skeptico/2005 ... leep_.html
David Albert, the professor from the Columbia University physics department who was featured in the film, is quoted in Salon.com saying:
I was edited in such a way as to
completely suppress my actual views about the matters the movie discusses. I am, indeed, profoundly unsympathetic to attempts at linking quantum mechanics with consciousness. Moreover,
I explained all that, at great length, on camera, to the producers of the film... Had I known that I would have been so radically misrepresented in the movie, I would certainly not have agreed to be filmed.
http://www.popsci.com/scitech/article/2 ... lt-science
One of the few legitimate academics in the film, David Albert, a philosopher of physics at Columbia University,
is outraged at the final product. He says that he
spent four hours patiently explaining to the filmmakers why quantum mechanics has nothing to do with consciousness or spirituality, only to see his statements edited and cut to the point where it appears as though he and the spirit warrior are speaking with one voice.
Aš suprantu kodėl tu tiki tokiom nesąmonėm. Tikint tokiom 'new age' pasakom gyvenimas iš tiesų atrodo gražesnis ir paprastesnis. Bet labai prašau, neužmiršk naudotis sveiku protu. Jeigu filme cituojami mokslininkai sako kad filmas yra nesąmonė, negi pradėsi ginčytis kad jie neteisūs?