Kadangi Sigma sake perkelt temas ten kur jos ir turi but, tai diskusijas apie Gyvsidabrio lempas uzbaigsim cia

Echoes sake:
"Koreguojamosios spalvos dujošvytes didžiaslėges gyvsidabrio lemputes galima naudoti ir namuose, ir lauke. Jos ypač tinkamos augalams apšviesti, nes skleidžiamoje šviesoje dominuoja raudoni ir mėlyni tonai, kurie augalams naudingi ir priimtini."
paimta iš "Osram" tinklapio. kokie argumentai pries?
Kadangi as to spektro nematau ir man augalai nemoka pasakyk ko jiem reikia tai as irgi remiuosi informacija rasta internete.
Kadangi tingiu as isvertinet tai pastinsiu angliskai, tikiuosi visi suprantat, jei kas nezinot primenu:
HPS = High Presure Sodium = natrio lempa
MH = Metal Halide = Metalo halido lempa
MV = Mercury Vapor = Gyvsidabrio lempa = sudas
Cituoju is puslapio
http://www.concept420.com/marijuana_lighting.htm
The easiest HID to buy, and least expensive initially are the fluorescent and mercury vapor lamps. MV will put out about 8000 lumens per 175 watts, and 150 watts of HPS puts out about 15k lumens, so HPS is almost twice as efficient. But the color spectrum from MV lamp output is not as good. HPS is high in reds, which works well for flowering, while the Metal Halide is rich in blues, needed for the best vegetative growth. Unfortunately, MV lamps provide the worst spectrum for plant growth, but are very inexpensive to purchase. They are not recommended, unless you find them free, and even then, the electricity/efficiency issues outweigh the initial costs saved. 400 watt HPS will output around 45k lumens.
***
Lamp Type Watts Lumens per bulb Total efficiency
Fluorescent Bulb 40 3000 400 watts = 30k lumens
Mercury Vapor 175 8000 400 watts = 20k lumens
Metal Halide 400 36000 400 watts = 36k lumens
High P. Sodium 400 45000 400 watts = 45k lumens
p.s. Jei Son T Agro 400w tai man rodos apie 55k liumenu
***
Cituoju is kito puslapio:
http://cannabisculture.com/articles/3094.html
There are two problems with mercury vapor lamps. First, they are not as efficient at turning power to light as HPS or MH lamps are. Using the same current, they emit less than half the light as an HPS and only 60% of an MH. Secondly, mercury vapor lamps, even with improved spectrums, emit a lower percentage of useable light than the more efficient lamps.
Dar bishki :
http://www.hightimes.com/ht/grow/conten ... cords=1000
/... There are certain parameters to keep in mind for required nutrients, temperatures and such. That said, I have to agree with Ed. I would never suggest using mercury vapor lamps either. If you ever decide to upgrade, adding a sodium during flowering will increase your rate of flowering substantially!
Cia pateikiau pirmus pasitaikiusius is google. Jei netingetum ir paskaitytum ka raso kituose brashkilijonuose puslapiu apie auginima pamatytum kad visur labai panasiai. Zinoma tau ta zolyte augs ir atrodys kad auga labai gerai, bet jei palygintum kaip auga po 400w sont agro tai skirtumas bus labai nemazas. Zinoma jei kitos salygos pus tinkamas auginimui (trasos, temperatura, ventiliacija, zemes kokybe, trasos, reflektorius, kaip daznai ir po kiek laistai, genai, veisle, menulio fazes, oro dregnumas, sviesos periodo trukme, vazonu dydis, kaip stipriai myli savo augalus ir pan. )
Gamintojo informacija nevisada gali buti teisinga, man patikimesne informacija is nesalisku saltiniu. Bet spresk pats.